MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094248520 · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3032131

3D Shrinking for Rapid Fabrication of Origami-Inspired Semi-Soft Pneumatic Actuators

2020· article· en· W3094248520 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelrahman S. Zaghloul, Gary M. Bone

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Materials and Mechanics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActuatorPneumatic actuatorSoft roboticsMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceRotary actuatorRobotFabricationComputer scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soft actuators are an essential component of soft robots. They are also well suited for human-friendly robots due to their intrinsic safety. The advantages of origami structures have motivated the development of origami-inspired semi-soft actuators. In this paper, a novel rapid, systematic and cost-effective fabrication method for durable origami-inspired semi-soft pneumatic actuators is presented. The proposed method employs heat-shrinkable polymers conforming to reusable molds. It is applicable to a variety of origami patterns, and it produces actuators with consistent performance. Two origami semi-soft pneumatic actuator designs (accordion and Yoshimura patterns) have been fabricated. Each actuator was fabricated in less than 10 minutes (not including the time required to create the molds and plastic components). A nonlinear finite-element model is developed to predict the actuator's folding behavior and blocked force. The results show that it can predict the blocked force with a maximum error of 5.7% relative to experimental measurements. This model can be used to improve the design of future actuators. Experimental results for isometric, isobaric, isotonic and cyclic fatigue tests for the accordion pattern actuator are included and discussed. The actuator prototype has a maximum stroke of 40 mm (or 36% of its effective length) and a maximum blocked force of 124 N at a vacuum pressure of -80 kPa. It also showed no decrease in performance and no leakage after 1000 cycles with a payload of 0.9 kg, demonstrating its durability compared to previous origami-inspired semi-soft pneumatic actuators. Finally, it has a high force-to-weight ratio as it can lift a load more than 118 times its own weight. Its performance demonstrates that powerful, lightweight and durable actuators can be easily produced by the proposed fabrication method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.755
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced Materials and MechanicsFrench-language works237,207