MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094275112 · doi:10.1002/pra2.369

Collaborative information monitoring: Preliminary results of a systematic mixed studies review and a framework synthesis

2020· review· en· W3094275112 on OpenAlexaff
Vera Granikov, Reem El Sherif, France Bouthillier, Pierre Pluye

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKnowledge Management and Sharing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacilitatorKnowledge managementConceptual frameworkComputer scienceWork (physics)Systematic reviewField (mathematics)Data scienceManagement scienceProcess managementEngineeringPsychologyMEDLINESociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Keeping up to date is essential across professional fields, yet it remains a challenge. Collaboration may act as a facilitator, yet more knowledge is needed to see if, how, and why it could overcome the challenges of keeping up to date. This systematic mixed studies review, a work in progress, bridges the conceptual fields of information monitoring/environmental scanning with collaborative information seeking. Specifically, a “best fit” framework synthesis approach is used to identify potential factors and outcomes, and to adapt a model of environmental scanning to collaborative information monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.078
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.930

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.078
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Association for Information Science and TechnologySame topicKnowledge Management and SharingFrench-language works237,207