MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094308423 · doi:10.1109/sas48726.2020.9220040

Demonstration of a Nonlinear Angular Rate Sensor based on Internal Resonance

2020· article· en· W3094308423 on OpenAlexaff
Atabak Sarrafan, S. Azimi, Behraad Bahreyni, Farid Golnaraghi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemResonance (particle physics)Computer sciencePhysicsAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports on the design, fabrication and rate table characterization of an H-shaped tuning fork microresonator with 2:1 internal resonance as an actuation mechanism. The nonlinear principle of operation addresses major challenges in MEMS Coriolis vibratory gyroscopes: eliminating the mode-matching requirement, minimizing instability and drift due to mechanical cross-coupling between the fundamental modes, and generating a wide operating frequency range with high-signal gain and less sensitivity to fluctuations in driving frequency. The rate measurement relies on capturing the half-order subharmonic response of the device while undergoing the angular velocity. The micromachined resonator is fabricated using the MEMS Integrated Design for Inertial Sensors platform offered by Teledyne DALSA Inc. The experimental finding demonstrated the prominent M-shaped nonlinear resonant curves due to a frequency ratio close to 2:1. The microresonator is nominally operated in the overlap region between the forward and backward frequency sweeps, where the signal gain is less sensitive to frequency fluctuations. The microresonator described here operates at 561.23600kHz in a near 2:1 frequency ratio between two anti-phase resonant modes. Experimental rate characterization of the microresonator revealed a linear dynamic range of 220 deg sec <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> with a sensitivity of 0.011 mV deg <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> sec <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-1</sup> using an 80V DC polarization voltage. The experimental results of the microresonator showed the induced oscillations in the so-called pendulum mode by Coriolis force coupling, despite a clear disparity on natural frequencies of the desired modes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.210

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207