A Two-Step Parameter Optimization Method for Low-Order Model-Based State-of-Charge Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The state-of-charge (SOC) estimation is an enabling technique for the efficient management and control of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). This article proposes a novel method for online SOC estimation, which manifests itself with both high accuracy and low complexity. Particularly, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is exploited to optimize the model parameters to ensure high modeling accuracy. Following this endeavor, the PSO algorithm is used to tune the error covariances of extended Kalman filter (EKF) leveraging the early stage segmental data of LIB utilization. Within this PSO-based tuning framework, the searching boundary is derived by scrutinizing the error transition property of the system. Experiments are performed to validate the proposed two-step PSO-optimized SOC estimation method. Results show that even by using a simple first-order model, the proposed method can give rise to a high SOC accuracy, which is comparative to those using complex high-order models. The proposed method is validated to excavate fully the potential of model-based estimators so that the computationally expensive model upgrade can be avoided.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".