MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094344155 · doi:10.31487/j.jso.2020.04.11

Highlighting the Role of Cdk6 Associated MicroRNAs in Cancer Treatment Using In Silico Approaches

2020· article· en· W3094344155 on OpenAlexaff
Sidra Batool, Muhammad Sibte Hasan Mahmood, Tiyyaba Furqan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsGrand River Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsmicroRNACyclin-dependent kinase 6In silicoComputational biologyMessenger RNAGeneCancerGene expressionBioinformaticsRegulation of gene expressionBiologyCancer researchMedicineGeneticsCyclin-dependent kinaseCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNA’s that controls the regulation of a gene. Due to the over expression or under expression of miRNAs it leads to cause tumor or any other type of cancers such as, melanoma, lymphoma, cardiovascular issue, breast cancer etc. So, miRNAs can be used as a drug target for cancer therapy. This study aimed to check binding cavities of microRNA's involved in regulation of CDK6 protein. There are 23 different families of miRNAs that are involved in regulation of CDK6. Each family has one or more miRNAs. All these miRNAs are involved in the up regulation or downregulation of a gene, which lead to different type of cancers. All miRNAs of each family docked with mRNA CDK6 protein. After performing in silico analysis of binding interactions of mRNA with miRNAs the results were further refined by their comparison with information regarding their energies, interaction of the mRNA and miRNAs. The results show that all miRNAs lie in Protein Kinase domain, but the residues that lie is different within the families and across the families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surgical OncologySame topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207