MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094349040 · doi:10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100145

Serial Cell-free DNA Assessments in Preclinical Models

2020· article· en· W3094349040 on OpenAlexafffund
Ariana Rostami, Caberry W. Yu, Scott V. Bratman

Bibliographic record

VenueSTAR Protocols · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersCanadian Cancer SocietyPrincess Margaret Cancer FoundationCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteGovernment of OntarioCancer Research Society
KeywordsCell-free fetal DNACancer researchMedicineCancerComputational biologyOncologyBiologyInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studying circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) release within preclinical model systems provides opportunities to investigate the mechanisms and kinetics underlying this process under various conditions. We present a detailed protocol for longitudinal evaluation of cfDNA release through (1) seeding of cancer cell lines and establishment of xenograft tumors, (2) treatment of cancer cells and xenograft tumors, (3) serial collection of cell line media and xenograft blood, and (4) processing and isolation of cfDNA for (5) quantification of cfDNA by quantitative PCR. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol please refer to Rostami et al. (2020).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSTAR ProtocolsSame topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207