Virtualization of elastic optical networks and regenerators with traffic grooming
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An elastic optical network (EON) plays an important role in transport technology for virtualization of networks. A key aspect of EONs is to establish lightpaths (virtual links) with exactly the amount of spectrum that is needed and with the possibility of grooming, the process of grouping many small traffic flows into larger units, creating a super-lightpath. Grooming eliminates the need for many guard bands between lightpaths and also saves transceivers; however, it often leads to the need to perform optical–electrical–optical conversions to multiple-data-rate optical signals at intermediate nodes. The aim of this paper is to provide a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) formulation, as well as heuristic and meta-heuristic approaches, for the design of multiple virtual optical networks (VONs) in an elastic optical substrate network with bandwidth-variable lightpaths, modulation format constraints, and virtual elastic regenerator placement. Traffic grooming is allowed inside each VON, and a distance-adaptive modulation format technique is employed to guarantee efficiency in terms of bandwidth for a physical substrate, subject to several virtual topologies. A reduced MILP formulation without grooming capability is also proposed for comparison. The complete MILP formulation jointly solves the virtual topology design, regenerator placement, and grooming problems, as well as the routing, modulation, and spectrum assignment (RMSA) problem. The reduced MILP formulation, heuristics, and meta-heuristic, on the other hand, separate the virtual topology design problem from the RMSA problem. It is shown that the grooming approach can provide good results, since it solves the problem for a complete design when compared to the approach without grooming. Furthermore, heuristic solutions for large networks are proposed, which present good performance (in terms of saving spectrum) for the design with large instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".