MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094364508 · doi:10.37689/acta-ape/2020ao02766

Erros na administração de medicamentos via parenteral: Perspectiva dos técnicos de enfermagem

2020· article· pt· W3094364508 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Paulista de Enfermagem · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPatient Safety and Medication Errors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumo Objetivo: Analisar a compreensão dos técnicos de enfermagem sobre os erros e eventos adversos relacionados a administração de medicamentos via parenteral. Métodos: Estudo de abordagem qualitativa, descritivo e exploratório. Realizado com 25 técnicos de enfermagem em um hospital universitário do Nordeste no período de março a junho de 2017. Para coleta dos dados, utilizou-se um roteiro de entrevista com perguntas abertas. Na análise de dados utilizou-se o método da Classificação Hierárquica Descendente através do software IRAMUTEQ e para análise [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.591
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it