Novel Therapeutic Approaches to Treat Brain Cancer Combining Cold Atmospheric Plasma, Therapeutic Prodrugs and Gold Nanoparticles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) makes up approximately 45% of all primary brain tumours. State of the art treatment at present involves concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) with radical radiotherapy which extends median survival from 12.1 months (radical radiotherapy alone) to 14.6 months according to the study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Brain Tumour and Radiotherapy Groups and the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC) Clinical Trials Group. Meanwhile, National Cancer Registry Ireland presented that GBM represents over 40% of all malignant brain tumours and had the worst five-year net survival (4%) compared to overall malignant brain cancer (five-year net survival, 19%) in Ireland. Long term survival of patients with GBM has not been significantly improved in the last 20 years. GBM tumours also have presented high level of resistance to normal treatments. Therefore, novel therapies to treat GBM are urgently needed. This study aimed to investigate efficient therapeutic methods by combining novel interventions, including cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and specific chemotherapeutic compounds to overcome the barriers of GBM treatment. Over the past decade CAP has emerged as a novel approach in health care area, especially cancer therapy. CAP generates chemically active species such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and has been demonstrated to act in synergy with a selection of traditional chemotherapeutic compounds which could reduce the effective concentrations of drugs needed at the tumour and may allow for targeted toxicity at sites exposed to the plasma field. AuNPs, well known as biocompatible drug delivery and diagnosis agents for cancer therapy, have been demonstrated to have synergistic anti cancer effects in combination with CAP treatment. In this project, for the first time, we investigated and described the detailed mechanism iii behind the synergistic anti-cancer effects between AuNPs and CAP treatment. Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 demonstrated that low dose treatment of CAP treatment was capable of promoting the uptake of AuNPs into glioblastoma U373MG cells via stimulated membrane repair clathrin-dependent endocytosis. The intracellular accumulation of AuNPs was tracked using atomic absorbance spectrometry (AAS) and simulated with numerical modelling to identify the enhanced uptake routine. AuNPs were tracked into early endosomes, late endosomes and finally lysosomes using specific fluorescent probes and confocal microscope. The lipid oxidation of cancer cells induced by CAP treatment was confirmed by various methods, including confocal microscopy, Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances (TBARS) assay and flow cytometry. Meanwhile, the related endocytosis pathway was determined to be clathrin dependent using multiple clathrin and caveola specific inhibitors and clathrin siRNA. In Chapter 4, we performed the screening of 47 prodrug candidates for their cytotoxicity against U373MG cells in combination with CAP treatment. The selection of chemotherapeutic compounds provided by collaborators have been tested to determine dose response curves with or without CAP treatment using Alamar Blue assay, thus, to characterise their synergistic potential in combination with CAP. Two leading candidates which showed significant cytotoxicity with CAP, have been identified from 47 compounds. Furthermore, the mechanism behind the synergistic cytotoxicity between one of the leading candidates, JW-04-061, and CAP treatment has been investigated. It has been demonstrated that reactive species, especially short-lived species, generated in culture medium may play a main role in the oxidation and activation of the prodrug during CAP treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".