MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094510447 · doi:10.1002/cpmb.128

Preparation of Mammalian Nascent RNA for Long Read Sequencing

2020· article· en· W3094510447 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kirsten A. Reimer, Karla M. Neugebauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols in Molecular Biology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of HealthNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRNAIntronBiologyRNA splicingComputational biologyRNA editingGeneticsPost-transcriptional modificationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Long read sequencing technologies now allow high‐quality sequencing of RNAs (or their cDNAs) that are hundreds to thousands of nucleotides long. Long read sequences of nascent RNA provide single‐nucleotide‐resolution information about co‐transcriptional RNA processing events—e.g., splicing, folding, and base modifications. Here, we describe how to isolate nascent RNA from mammalian cells through subcellular fractionation of chromatin‐associated RNA, as well as how to deplete poly(A) + RNA and rRNA, and, finally, how to generate a full‐length cDNA library for use on long read sequencing platforms. This approach allows for an understanding of coordinated splicing status across multi‐intron transcripts by revealing patterns of splicing or other RNA processing events that cannot be gained from traditional short read RNA sequencing. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1 : Subcellular fractionation Basic Protocol 2 : Nascent RNA isolation and adapter ligation Basic Protocol 3 : cDNA amplicon preparation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.417
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Protocols in Molecular BiologySame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207