MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long Term Followup of Sickle Cell Disease Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant from Uganda

2017· article· en· W3094564739 on OpenAlexaff
Musa K. Waiswa, Gaurav Kharya, Divya Bansal, Silky Jain, Edward Kasirye, Francis Ssali, David Ndawula, Henry Ddungu, Madeleine Verhovsek, Deogratias Munube

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBusulfanFludarabineThioTEPASurgeryHematopoietic stem cell transplantationInternal medicineGastroenterologyBone marrowTransplantationCyclophosphamideChemotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Sickle cell disease (SCD) remains associated with high risk of morbidity and early death. Many patients in sub-Saharan Africa continue to experience severe complications despite best supportive care. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) can be considered for a select group of patients. When successful, HSCT is economical and improves quality of life. We report the experience from our south-south partnership whereby Ugandan patients with SCD have undergone HSCT at the Bone Marrow Transplant Center in Gurgaon, India Material and methods: 23 consecutive patients suffering from SCD who underwent HSCT between June 2014 and July 2017 were included in the study. Eleven underwent matched sibling donor bone marrow transplant (BMT) using busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day for 4 days, cyclophosphamid 50mg/kg/day for 4 days, and hATG (PfizerATGAM) 30mg/kg/day for 3 days. Two adult patients underwent matched sibling donor HSCT using reduced intensity conditioning with busulfan 3.2 mg/kg/day for 4 days, cyclophosphamid 60mg/kg/day for 2 days, and ATG (PfizerATGAM) 30mg/kg/day x 3 days. Immune suppression for for HSCT patients was cyclosporine 3mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses starting D-4 and methotrexate 10mg/m2 on D+1 followed by 7mg/m2 on day 3, 6 and 11 post HSCT. Ten patients underwent haploidentical HSCT using hypertransfusion (target Hb 11-13gm/dl), hydroxyurea (20mg/kg/day) and azathioprine (2mg/kg/day) from day -45, conditioned with Thiotepa 10mg/kg in two divided doses (D-7), fludarabine 30mg/m2 (D-6 to D-2), cyclophosphamide 14.5 mg/kg (D-5, D-4), TBI 2Gy with thymic shielding (D-1), rATG (Genzyme Thymoglobulin) 1.5 mg/kg (D-9 to D-7). GVHD prophylaxis included PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on D3 and 4, tacrolimus (target level 5-15 ng/ml) or sirolimus (target levels 10-15ng/ml) (till 6 months post HSCT) and MMF (till D35) starting from D5. Results: The median patient age was 8 years (range 10 months-31 years). Before transplantation all patients had repeated episodes of SCD complications warranting a transplant. All were non-responsive to hydroxyurea. Of the 23 patients, 18 survived without sickle cell disease with Lansky/Karnofsky scores of 100. One had a primary graft failure another secondary graft failure with recurrence of disease. At median follow up of 479 days (range 51-1204) the probabilities of survival, SCD-free survival, and transplant-related mortality after transplant were 87%, 78%, and 13%, respectively. Three children who underwent haploidentical HSCT died. One died due to PRES with intracranial hemorrhage at day 86 post BMT, another one due to primary graft failure with Klebsiella sepsis with shock. The third child died due to complicated falciparum malaria and possible invasive fungal infection at day 24 post HSCT. He had full donor chimerism. Conclusion: Outcomes of HSCT in SCD have improved significantly. With better conditioning regimens and improved supportive care, alternative donor transplant and adult HSCT have become viable therapeutic options. HSCT should be strongly considered as a curative modality for selected patients suffering from SCD. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→French-language works237,207→