MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094591297 · doi:10.15326/jcopdf.7.4.2020.0174

Editorial: Risk Prediction in Smokers

2020· editorial· en· W3094591297 on OpenAlexaff
Jørgen Vestbo

Bibliographic record

VenueChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD Foundation · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Risk is usually perceived as the possibility of something bad happening.Risk prediction is therefore about estimating the likelihood that something bad will happen -and as physicians we often think about patient risk.Risk prediction is well established in many areas of medicine, probably most well-known in the area of risk of cardiovascular disease where the Framingham Risk Score has been applied in clinical practice for more or less 20 years. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.050
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.050
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.005
Bibliometrics0.0060.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0110.005
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0230.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD FoundationSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207