MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094595091 · doi:10.1080/21681163.2020.1835541

The application and optimization of super-resolution reconstruction for isotropic out-of-plane MRI to study the musculoskeletal system

2020· article· en· W3094595091 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin J. Tse, Luke Garland, Michael T. Kuczynski, Peter Salat, Yves Pauchard, Sarah L. Manske

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArthritis Society
KeywordsIsotropyMagnetic resonance imagingComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationIterative reconstructionVisualizationPlane (geometry)CADImage resolutionReal-time MRIBiomedical engineeringMedicineRadiologyPhysicsMathematicsOpticsGeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we optimised and adapted a post-processing super-resolution reconstruction (SRR) algorithm for its use in the semi-automated isotropic reconstruction of non-isotropically acquired musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image (MRI) data. The ability to produce isotropic MRI data facilitated the (1) enhanced out-of-plane image visualisation; (2) semi-automated image registration with CT data of the same anatomical site; and (3) improved image segmentation. The effectiveness of the SRR algorithm was demonstrated on several musculoskeletal scans including ex vivo tibial plateaus, in vivo knees and hands with varying levels of structural complexity and potential for motion artefact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & VisualizationSame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207