MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094612360 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v46i10a08f

Surveillance sentinelle du risque de la maladie de Lyme au Canada, 2019 : résultats de la première année du Réseau sentinelle canadien de surveillance de la maladie de Lyme (ReSCaL)

2020· article· fr· W3094612360 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Camille Guillot, J Badcock, Katie M. Clow, Jennifer Cram, Shaun J. Dergousoff, Antonia Dibernardo, Michelle Evason, Erin Fraser, Eleni Galanis, Salima Gasmi, Greg J. German, Douglas T Howse, Claire M. Jardine, Emily Jenkins, Jules K. Koffi, M Kulkarni, Lisa Lindsay, G Lumsden, Roman McKay, Muhammad Morshed, Douglas Munn, Mark P. Nelder, Joe R. Nocera, Marion Ripoche, Kateryn Rochon, Curtis Russell, Andreea M. Slatculescu, Benoit Talbot, Karine Thivierge, Maarten J. Voordouw, Catherine Bouchard, Patrick A. Leighton

Bibliographic record

VenueRelevé des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsSte. Anne's HospitalPublic Health OntarioKingston Health Sciences CentreUniversity of OttawaHealth PEIPublic Health Agency of CanadaUniversity of Prince Edward IslandUniversity of ManitobaInstitut National de Santé Publique du QuébecAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNova Scotia Health AuthorityBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of GuelphGovernment of New BrunswickUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversité de MontréalCTT Group (Canada)Université de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

résultats de la première année du Réseau canadien sentinelle de la maladie de Lyme (RCSMLy).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.177

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelevé des maladies transmissibles au CanadaSame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207