Simultaneous Feature Selection and Classification for Data-Adaptive Kernel-Penalized SVM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simultaneous feature selection and classification have been explored in the literature to extend the support vector machine (SVM) techniques by adding penalty terms to the loss function directly. However, it is the kernel function that controls the performance of the SVM, and an imbalance in the data will deteriorate the performance of an SVM. In this paper, we examine a new method of simultaneous feature selection and binary classification. Instead of incorporating the standard loss function of the SVM, a penalty is added to the data-adaptive kernel function directly to control the performance of the SVM, by firstly conformally transforming the kernel functions of the SVM, and then re-conducting an SVM classifier based on the sparse features selected. Both convex and non-convex penalties, such as least absolute shrinkage and selection (LASSO), moothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) and minimax concave penalty (MCP) are explored, and the oracle property of the estimator is established accordingly. An iterative optimization procedure is applied as there is no analytic form of the estimated coefficients available. Numerical comparisons show that the proposed method outperforms the competitors considered when data are imbalanced, and it performs similarly to the competitors when data are balanced. The method can be easily applied in medical images from different platforms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".