MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094770191 · doi:10.35774/econa2020.01.01.118

FOREIGN EXPERIENCE OF STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT

2020· article· en· W3094770191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Analysis · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Issues in Ukraine
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStrategic planningRestructuringBusinessProcess (computing)Process managementIdentification (biology)Plan (archaeology)Regional planningDevelopment planMarketingComputer scienceUrban planningGeographyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction. The strategic goals of socio-economic development of the regions of Ukraine, which were set in numerous concepts, strategies, programs and other strategic documents, both at the state and regional levels, were not achieved. This is due to the lack of interconnectedness of these documents, the mechanism of control over their implementation and inconsistency with the real needs of the regions. Goal. The aim of the study is to reveal the organization of strategic planning of regional development in France, Germany, USA, Canada and Japan, which may become the basis for further, more thorough, strategic planning of regional development in Ukraine. Results. The creation and implementation of the French regional development strategy is seen as an ongoing process with an emphasis on restructuring the regions, maximizing their potential, supporting small and medium-sized businesses by coordinating the state plan with private business and coordinating their interests with the state. Considerable attention is paid to the ecological component of development at the meso level. The main requirements of strategic planning in Germany are: consensus of economic interests of major regional stakeholders; identification of specific participants in the strategic planning process, coordinators and users of the achieved results; establishing clear priorities in the development of the territory provided with resources; the adequacy of the coordinator's organizational structure in relation to the process of achieving the stated goals in the strategic plan. Strategic planning of regional development in the United States is based on total computerization, based on a single network of nine economic regions of the country, which is the basis for a comprehensive approach to regulating regional development in accordance with national strategy, establishing the format of effective plans and reports and procedures. in case of non-compliance, personal responsibility for achieving results. In Canada, it is important in strategic planning to test the tools provided for in the strategic plan in certain territorial areas of administrative entities. The mechanism for implementing strategic planning in Japan is based on a strong focus on achieving group goals, whereby the central government determines the range of tools for regional development, regional bodies are responsible for its implementation, and private business plans its activities based on national strategy indicators. Improving foreign experience should be built taking into account the specifics of our country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.664
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it