MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094788775 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-136999

Venetoclax Alone or in Combination with Chemotherapy: Responses in Pediatric Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Heterogeneous Genomic Profiles

2020· article· en· W3094788775 on OpenAlexaff
Seth E. Karol, Henrique Bittencourt, Daniel A. Morgenstern, Margaret E. Macy, Seong Lin Khaw, Todd M. Cooper, Arnaud Petit, Giridharan Ramsingh, Bo Tong, Kristina Unnebrink, Deeksha Vishwamitra, Fengjiao Dunbar, Betty Prine, Tammy L. Palenski, Andrew E. Place

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenetoclaxMedicineInternal medicineOncologyVenChemotherapy regimenInduction chemotherapyRegimenChemotherapyLeukemiaGastroenterologyChronic lymphocytic leukemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a molecularly heterogeneous group of diseases lacking therapy options that would improve overall survival. Venetoclax (VEN) is an oral inhibitor for selective targeting of B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2), which is highly expressed in most patients (pts) with AML and has demonstrated promising efficacy in pediatric pts with AML when combined with chemotherapy (CTx) (Karol SE, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:551-560). Here, we present safety, efficacy, and preliminary genomic results from pediatric pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML receiving VEN + CTx. Methods: This phase 1 open-label, 2-part, multicenter study (NCT03236857) enrolled pts <25 years with R/R malignancies; here we report on R/R AML. During VEN monotherapy (monoTx), 10 pts received a weight- or age-adjusted adult-equivalent oral daily dose of 800 mg VEN after a 3-day ramp-up to mitigate tumor lysis syndrome risk. Standard of care CTx could be added after 21 days of VEN monoTx at the discretion of the treating physicians. In cohort expansion, 26 pts were enrolled with standard of care CTx allowed after VEN ramp-up. Primary and secondary endpoints included safety and preliminary efficacy of VEN monoTx and VEN + CTx. In addition, exploratory biomarker analyses were performed. For genomic analyses, whole exome sequencing was performed on pretreatment blood or bone marrow samples, and highly recurrent genetic alterations across various functional classifications in AML were analyzed. Previously documented gene fusion data were acquired through site-reported cytogenetic entries at screening. RNA sequencing was performed on pretreatment blood or bone marrow samples and BCL2 family expression was assessed. Results: As of June 2020, 36 pts with R/R AML were enrolled and received VEN monoTx (n=3) and VEN + CTx (n=33: VEN + decitabine [VEN-DEC, n=5], azacitidine [VEN-AZA, n=19], or low- [VEN-LDAC, n=1] or high-dose cytarabine [VEN-HDAC, n=8]) (Table). The primary reason for VEN discontinuation was progressive disease (n=19); median duration of VEN therapy was 3.1 months (range 0.2-9.3). All pts experienced adverse events (AEs); 3 pts (n=1 VEN-DEC, n=2 VEN-AZA) had fatal AEs considered unrelated to VEN. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were febrile neutropenia (58%) and hypokalemia (33%). The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 25% (9/36); median duration of response was 0.8 month (95% CI, 0.5, 3.6). The best ORR was seen with VEN-HDAC (4/8, 50%) with 1 complete response (CR), 1 CR without platelet recovery, 1 CR with incomplete marrow recovery (CRi), and 1 partial response (PR); 2 pts achieved minimal residual disease negativity and 2 pts proceeded to transplant. The ORR with VEN-AZA was 26% (5/19), with 3 CR/CRi and 2 PR. No responses were seen with VEN monoTx or VEN + other CTx. The genomic landscape of biomarker-evaluable pts was highly heterogeneous (Figure A). Mutations of genes involved in epigenetic modification (MYH11, IDH2, ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, and NSD1) and transcription regulation (GATA1, WT1, RUNX1, and CEBPA) were the most common, in 58% and 48% of pts, respectively. Analysis of the recurring mutations found in ≥2 pts revealed that responses to VEN-AZA were seen in pts with IDH2 (1/4), MYH11 (2/6), RUNX1 (1/3), or FLT3 (1/3) mutations, and responses to VEN-HDAC were seen in pts with JAK2 (1/4) or GATA1 (1/3) mutations. Pts with WT1 (3/6) and PTPN11 (3/4) mutations responded to both regimens. Pts with TP53 (n=2) or ETV6 (n=3) mutations and PML-RARA (n=2) or KMT2A rearrangements (n=8) did not respond to any treatment. Gene expression profiling revealed that BCL-xL expression was significantly higher compared with BCL2;MCL1 levels were the highest (Figure B). There was no association between expression of these genes and response. Mutations were seen in BCL2 and MCL1 (n=1 each), but not in BCL-xL. Conclusions: VEN + CTx was well tolerated in pediatric pts with R/R AML, with no unexpected toxicities. Preliminary efficacy was seen in pts receiving VEN-AZA or VEN-HDAC: ORR 26% and 50%, respectively. VEN + CTx resulted in responses in pts harboring mutations across a range of functional classifications; however, some alterations may confer resistance. Due to the limited number of pts harboring each mutation and the overall heterogeneity of the genomic landscape, these findings need to be evaluated in a larger population, and warrant further investigation. Disclosures Karol: AbbVie Inc.: Other: Unrelated to this study, St. Jude has received a charitable contribution from AbbVie, Inc. The charitable contribution is not being used for clinical or research activities, including any activities related to this study. . Bittencourt:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Novartis: Consultancy. Morgenstern:EUSA Pharma: Consultancy, Other: travel support; Bayer: Consultancy; Clarity Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Macy:Merck: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Bayer: Other: Institutional Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Roche: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Khaw:Amgen: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: Institutional Research Funding; AbbVie Inc.: Other: Institutional Research Funding; Novartis: Other: travel, accommodation, expenses; Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research.: Patents & Royalties: Recipient of a share in royalty payments . Cooper:Celgene: Other: Spouse was an employee of Celgene (through August 2019). Ramsingh:Genentech: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Tong:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Unnebrink:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Vishwamitra:AbbVie, Inc.: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Dunbar:Abbvie: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Prine:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Palenski:AbbVie: Current Employment, Other: may hold stock or other options. Place:Novartis: Consultancy, Other: Institutional Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is a BCL-2 inhibitor that is FDA approved for some indications. Venetoclax for treatment of pediatric AML is not an approved indication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207