MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094826768 · doi:10.17159/caj/2000/10/5.7095

RECYCLING OF FERROCHROME FURNACE BAGFILTER DUST AT SAMANCOR CHROME - A SUCCESS STORY

2000· article· en· W3094826768 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueClean Air Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRecycling and Waste Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsKruger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerrochromeSelection (genetic algorithm)Waste managementEngineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringMetallurgyMaterials scienceComputer scienceSmelting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recycling offerrochrome bagfilter dust is examined as an alternative to disposal. A briefoverview is given on the history ofbagfilter dust handling and force influencing current and future dust handling strategy. A rationale for the selection ofthe pin agglomerator is given, and after discussing the theoretical aspects ofrecycling, the practical experience with the pin agglomerator is related. The paper concludes by confirmingthe successful integral role that bagfilter dust recycling by means ofthe pin agglomerator has played at two sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.662
Threshold uncertainty score0.986

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it