MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094837795 · doi:10.1190/int-2020-0161.1

Mississippian Meramec lithologies and petrophysical property variability, stack trend, Anadarko Basin, Oklahoma

2021· article· en· W3094837795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael J. Miller, Matthew J. Pranter, Ishank Gupta, Deepak Devegowda, Kurt J. Marfurt, Carl Sondergeld, Chandra Rai, Chris T. McLain, James L. Packwood, Richard E. Larese

Bibliographic record

VenueInterpretation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyLithologyPetrophysicsCalciteDiagenesisSiltstonePetroleum reservoirPetrologyPermeability (electromagnetism)Well loggingMineralogyGeochemistryStructural basinFaciesGeomorphologyPaleontologyPorosityGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mississippian Meramec reservoirs of the Sooner Trend in the Anadarko (Basin) in Canadian and Kingfisher Counties (STACK) play are comprised of silty limestones, calcareous siltstones, argillaceous calcareous siltstones, argillaceous siltstones, and mudstones. We found that core-defined reservoir lithologies are related to petrophysics-based rock types derived from porosity-permeability relationships using a flow-zone indicator approach. We classified lithologies and rock types in noncored wells using an artificial neural network (ANN) with overall accuracies of 93% and 70%, respectively. We observed that mudstone-rich rock type 1 exhibits high clay and relatively low calcite, whereas calcareous-rich rock type 3 has high calcite and low clay content with rock type 2 falling in between as a balance between rock types 1 and 3. Results of the ANN were applied to a suite of well logs in noncored wells in which we generated lithology and rock-type logs for the Meramec. We identified that the Meramec consists of seven stratigraphic units characterized as strike-elongate, shoaling-upward parasequences; each parasequence is capped by a marine-flooding surface. The lower three parasequences (lower Meramec) form a retrogradational parasequence set that back steps to the northwest and is capped by a maximum flooding surface. The upper Meramec is characterized by parasequences that form an aggradational to progradational stacking pattern followed again by a retrogradational trend. We predict that the parasequence stacking, associated lithology distribution, and diagenetic cements appear to control the spatial distribution of petrophysical properties (porosity, permeability, and water saturation), pore volume, and hydrocarbon pore volume (HCPV). Calcareous-rich lithologies exhibit lower porosity, permeability, HCPV, and higher water saturation. We deduced that argillaceous-rich lithologies that occur near the maximum flooding surface are the most favorable reservoir intervals because they exhibit relatively higher porosity, permeability, HCPV, and lower water saturation. Productivity could not be directly correlated to rock types as operational and completion factors as well as overpressure and oil phase play important roles on production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInterpretationSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207