MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094875456 · doi:10.1093/jscr/rjaa408

Large pseudoaneurysm arising from the deep femoral artery after hip fracture fixation

2020· article· en· W3094875456 on OpenAlexaff
Sylvie Bowden, Arash Jaberi, Graham Roche‐Nagle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Surgical Case Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeep Femoral ArteryPseudoaneurysmFemoral arteryFixation (population genetics)SurgerySuperficial femoral arteryFemoral fractureHip fractureRadiologyFemurAneurysmInternal medicineOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hip fracture is a common condition of increasing global concern. Vascular injury as a complication after hip fracture repair is rare. A 90-year-old woman developed swelling and pain to her proximal thigh 1 month after uneventful hip fracture fixation. Ultrasound revealed a large pseudoaneurysm of the deep femoral artery, which was successfully treated with transcatheter embolization. Pseudoaneurysms have numerous etiologies. In this case, vascular injury is suspected to be a consequence of proximal migration of the lesser trochanteric fragment. Unfortunately, pseudoaneurysms are often not appreciated due to the nonspecific nature of the presenting symptoms. Diagnosis should be confirmed radiologically and management depends on the location and size of the pseudoaneurysm, as well as patient comorbidities. Pseudoaneurysm after hip fracture fixation is a rare but serious complication. Diagnosis is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms. A high index of suspicion is imperative to prevent life-threatening rupture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Surgical Case ReportsSame topicVascular Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207