Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’œuvre du poète francophone Gherasim Luca (1913-1994) comprend de nombreuses références au renversement, à la révolution (au sens de retournement) et à l’inversion dans son ensemble. Ces bouleversements touchent tous les aspects de son écriture, tant sur le plan symbolique et métaphysique, que sur le plan de la langue, de la poétique et de l’esthétique. L’étude de ces éléments dans trois textes issus de deux recueils majeurs du poète, Un Loup à travers une loupe (1945) et L’Extrême-occidentale (1961), permet d’en comprendre les enjeux cognitifs, déployant les richesses de la langue et la suggestion poétique d’une manière arborescente. De fait, les mondes inversés et hétérogènes de Gherasim Luca s’agrègent paradoxalement avec une certaine fluidité qui montre que le cheminement poétique, graphique et sonore, est aussi un entrelacs d’images qui permet au texte de se dérouler infiniment à la façon des rêves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".