MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094919262 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.035201

Plasma frequency in doped highly mismatched alloys

2021· article· en· W3094919262 on OpenAlexafffund
Hassan Allami, Jacob J. Krich

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor materials and interfaces
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPlasmonDopingSemiconductorBand gapMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsPlasma oscillationAlloyPlasmaFrequency bandLow frequencyEffective mass (spring–mass system)Range (aeronautics)Conduction bandElectronic band structureOptoelectronicsPhysicsElectronQuantum mechanicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly mismatched alloys (HMAs) have band structures strongly modified due to the introduction of the alloying element. We consider HMAs where the isolated state of the alloying element is near the host conduction band, which causes the conduction band to split into two bands. We determine the bulk plasma frequency when the lower-energy band is partially occupied, as by doping, using a semianalytical method based on a disorder-averaged Green's function. We include the nontrivial effects of interband transitions to the higher-energy band, which limit the plasma frequency to be less than an effective band gap. We show that the distribution of states in the split bands causes plasmons in HMAs to behave differently than plasmons in standard metals and semiconductors. The effective mass of the lower split band ${m}^{*}$ changes with alloy fraction, and we find that the plasmon frequency with small carrier concentration $n$ scales with $\sqrt{n}/{m}^{*}$ rather than the $\sqrt{n/{m}^{*}}$ that is expected in standard materials. We suggest experiments to observe these phenomena. Considering the typical range of material parameters in this group of alloys and taking a realistic example, we suggest that HMAs can serve as highly tunable low-frequency plasmonic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicSemiconductor materials and interfacesFrench-language works237,207