MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094944282 · doi:10.1182/blood-2020-142270

Comparison of the Transcriptomic Signatures in Pediatric and Adult CML

2020· article· en· W3094944282 on OpenAlexaff
Minyoung Youn, Hee‐Don Chae, Stephanie M. Smith, Alex Gia Lee, Lara Murphy Jones, Michele Donato, E. Alejandro Sweet‐Cordero, Parveen Abidi, Henrique Bittencourt, Norman J. Lacayo, Gary V. Dahl, Catherine Aftandilian, Kara L. Davis, Jairo Matthews, Steven M. Kornblau, Min Huang, Nathan Sumarsono, Michele S. Redell, Cecilia Fu, I-Ming L. Chen, Todd A. Alonzo, Elizabeth A. Eklund, Jason Gotlib, Purvesh Khatri, Nobuko Hijiya, Kathleen M. Sakamoto

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD34MyeloidBone marrowTranscriptomeBiologyLeukemiaGeneMedicineImmunologyGene expressionGeneticsStem cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) accounts for 10-15% of pediatric myeloid leukemias and 2-9% of all pediatric leukemias. There are several unique characteristics of CML diagnosed in children, adolescents, and young adults, compared to adults. They present with higher white blood counts and larger spleens, suggesting that the biology of pediatric CML is different from adult CML. We hypothesize that the differences in clinical presentation of pediatric CML patients are due to unique molecular characteristics that differ from adult CML patients. To test this hypothesis, we studied the transcriptomic signature of pediatric CD34+ CML cells compared to adult CML and normal age-matched bone marrow CD34+ cells. Methods CD34+ cells were isolated by FACS from pediatric CML (n=9), adult CML (n=10), pediatric normal (n=10) and adult normal (n=10) bone marrow samples. Total RNA was isolated from cells, and cDNA libraries were generated. Prepared libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 4000 instrument. Raw sequences were trimmed and aligned to the hg38 reference genome with STAR/2.5.1b aligner. Gene level counts were determined with STAR -quantMode option using gene annotations from GENCODE (p5). Differential gene expression and pathway analysis were conducted with R/3.5.3. Counts were normalized with trimmed mean of M-values (TMM) from the EdgeR/ 3.24.3 package and further transformed with VOOM from the Limma/ 3.38.3 package. A linear model using the empirical Bayes analysis pipeline also from Limma was then used to obtain p-values, adjusted p-values and log-fold changes (LogFC). We performed three comparisons: (1) Pediatric CML vs Normal, (2) Adult CML vs Normal, and (3) Pediatric CML vs Adult CML. A False Discovery Rate (FDR) of £ .05 and absolute log2 fold-change > 1 was used to define differentially expressed genes in each comparison. Over-representation analysis was used to identify potentially unique pathways based on differentially expressed genes. Clinical and demographic features at diagnosis were extracted for pediatric and adult CML patients and compared using Fisher's exact test (categorical variables) or Wilcoxon rank sum test (continuous variables). Results Pediatric patients were diagnosed with CML at a median of 11 years (interquartile range (IQR): 10-14) compared to 54 years (IQR: 33-62) for adult patients. At diagnosis, pediatric patients had higher platelet counts (p=0.001) and larger spleen sizes (p=0.010) than adult patients, whereas the white blood cell count and phase at diagnosis did not differ. We found 606 genes (210 up- and 396 down-regulated) differentially expressed in pediatric CML CD34+ cells compared to pediatric normal controls. Interestingly, transcriptional regulators involved in blood cell differentiation including GATA1, TAL1, and KLF1 were differentially enriched in pediatric CML. In comparing adult CML patients to normal adult CD34+ cells, we found 920 genes (379 up- and 541 down-regulated) differentially expressed. Among all dysregulated genes we identified (1352 genes), 174 genes (54 up- and 120-down-regulated) overlapped when comparing pediatric and adult CML patients. Significantly enriched pathways in both adult and pediatric CML cells included PI3K/AKT signaling, MAPK signaling, and Notch/Wnt signaling, which have been previously reported. We found 437 unique genes that were dysregulated only in pediatric CML (270 up- and 167 down-regulated). Notch/Wnt signaling and Rho signaling pathways were significantly enriched. DLC1, a tumor suppressor gene that encodes a RhoGTPase-activating protein, has been known to be downregulated in solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Interestingly, our data showed that DLC1 is significantly upregulated by 3-fold (p=0.0238) in pediatric CML, but not adult CML CD34+ cells. In addition, we observed that ABR, an inducer of C/EBPa that encodes an activator of RhoGEF and GTPase, was significantly downregulated by 2-fold (p=0.0119) in pediatric but not in adult CML CD34+ cells. Conclusion These results demonstrate unique molecular characteristics of pediatric CML that may contribute to the clinical differences at presentation between adult and pediatric disease. A better understanding of the particular biology of pediatric CML might impact the treatment of those patients in the future. Disclosures Gotlib: Deciphera: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: co-chair of the Study Steering Committee and Research Funding; Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Chair of the Response Adjudication Committee and Research Funding, Research Funding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207