MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094997234 · doi:10.1128/mbio.02796-20

SPOR Proteins Are Required for Functionality of Class A Penicillin-Binding Proteins in Escherichia coli

2020· article· en· W3094997234 on OpenAlexafffund
Manuel Pazos, Katharina Peters, Adrien Boes, Yalda Safaei, Calem Kenward, Nathanael A. Caveney, Cédric Laguri, Eefjan Breukink, N.C.J. Strynadka, Jean‐Pierre Simorre, Mohammed Terrak, Waldemar Vollmer

Bibliographic record

VenuemBio · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFrench Infrastructure for Integrated Structural BiologyHoward Hughes Medical InstituteAgence Nationale de la RechercheUK Research and InnovationWellcome TrustFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
KeywordsEscherichia coliPenicillin binding proteinsMicrobiologyEscherichia coli ProteinsChemistryComputational biologyBiologyBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

has four SPOR proteins that bind peptidoglycan, of which FtsN is essential for cell division. DamX and DedD are suggested to have semiredundant functions in cell division based on genetic evidence. Here, we solved the structure of the SPOR domain of DedD, and we show that both DamX and DedD interact with and stimulate the synthetic activity of the peptidoglycan synthases PBP1A and PBP1B, suggesting that these class A PBP enzymes act in concert with peptidoglycan-binding proteins during cell division.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemBioSame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207