Distributed Source Simulation With No Communication
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the problem of distributed source simulation with no communication, in which Alice and Bob observe sequences$U^{n}$and$V^{n}$respectively, drawn from a joint distribution$p_{UV}^ {\otimes n}$, and wish to locally generate sequences$X^{n}$and$Y^{n}$respectively with a joint distribution that is close (in KL divergence) to$p_{XY}^ {\otimes n}$. We provide a single-letter condition under which such a simulation is asymptotically possible with a vanishing KL divergence. Our condition is nontrivial only in the case where the Gàcs-Körner (GK) common information between$U$and$V$is nonzero, and we conjecture that only scalar Markov chains$X-U-V-Y$can be simulated otherwise. Motivated by this conjecture, we further examine the case where both$p_{UV}$and$p_{XY}$are doubly symmetric binary sources with parameters$p,q\leq 1/2$respectively. While it is trivial that in this case$p\leq q$is both necessary and sufficient, we use Fourier analytic tools to show that when$p$is close to$q$then any successful simulation is close to being scalar in the total variation sense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".