Kinetics of Crystallization and Orientational Ordering in Dipolar Particle Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The kinetic mechanisms underlying the bottom-up assembly of colloidal particles have been widely investigated in efforts to control crystallization pathways and to direct growth into targeted superstructures for applications, including photonic crystals. Current work builds on recent progress in the development of kinetic theories for crystal growth of bcc crystals in systems with short-range interparticle interactions, accounting for a greater diversity of crystal structures (including fcc and noncubic crystals) and the role of the longer-ranged interactions and orientational degrees of freedom arising in polar systems. We address the importance of orientational ordering processes in influencing crystal growth in such polar systems, thus advancing the theory beyond the treatment of the translational ordering processes considered in previous investigations. The work employs comprehensive molecular dynamics simulations that resolve key crystallization processes and are used in the development of a quantitative theoretical framework based on ideas from time-dependent Ginzburg–Landau theory. The significant effect of orientational ordering (polarization or magnetization) on the crystallization kinetics could be potentially leveraged to achieve solidification kinetics steering through external electric or magnetic fields. Our combined theory/simulation approach provides opportunities for future investigations of more complex crystallization kinetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".