MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095249487 · doi:10.1145/3419111.3421305

Finding the right cloud configuration for analytics clusters

2020· article· en· W3095249487 on OpenAlex
Muhammad Bilal, Marco Canini, Rodrigo Rodrigues

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
FundersCentro de Matemática Universidade do PortoFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaEducation, Audiovisual and Culture Executive AgencyEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceCloud computingBenchmarkingAnalyticsDistributed computingCluster (spacecraft)Task (project management)Data scienceOperating systemEngineeringSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finding good cloud configurations for deploying a single distributed system is already a challenging task, and it becomes substantially harder when a data analytics cluster is formed by multiple distributed systems since the search space becomes exponentially larger. In particular, recent proposals for single system deployments rely on benchmarking runs that become prohibitively expensive as we shift to joint optimization of multiple systems, as users have to wait until the end of a long optimization run to start the production run of their job.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207