An Optimization Modeling Method for Adaptive Systems Based on Goal and Feature Models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive Socio-Cyber-Physical Systems (SCPSs) need a comprehensive requirements modeling approach to embed social concerns (goals) in their development activities. Since these kinds of systems often involve complicated and dynamic interactions with their environment, they must react to environmental changes using different potential solutions that satisfy social concerns as well as system objectives and qualities. This paper presents an optimization modeling method that monitors an SCPS's environment and qualities to provide design-time and runtime solutions that satisfy required goals of the system and its stakeholders, as well as imposed correctness constraints specified in a feature model. We combine arithmetic functions generated automatically from goal and feature models as an objective function input to an optimization tool (IBM CPLEX) in order to compute, at design time, optimal solutions for common situations. Runtime optimization can also be used for unforeseen situations. An illustrative example is used to assess the feasibility of the method. The results show that optimizing the mathematical functions of goal/feature models together is beneficial in exploring SCPS requirements and detecting weaknesses in common adaptation situations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it