MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095326457 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2019-0360

Three-dimensional numerical simulation of local scour around circular side-by-side bridge piers with ice cover

2020· article· en· W3095326457 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mohammad Reza Namaee, Jueyi Sui, Yongsheng Wu, Natalie Linklater

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPierBridge scourGeologyGeotechnical engineeringTurbulenceSediment transportBridge (graph theory)Computer simulationSedimentMechanicsEngineeringStructural engineeringGeomorphologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Local scour around piers is one of the primary causes of collapse of bridges that cross rivers. The most severe scouring occurs in cold regions where ice cover significantly changes the velocity profile. Having an accurate estimation of the maximum scour depth around bridge piers, especially in cold regions, is necessary for a safer design of piers. In this study, 3D numerical models are compared to laboratory experiments to examine the process of local scour around bridge piers with and without smooth and rough ice cover. By using the equation of Meyer-Peter and Müller, the sediment transport model is validated to approximate the transport of the sediment particles. Numerical results showed good agreements with experimental observations where the maximum scour depth and turbulent kinetic energy around bridge piers were the highest under rough ice cover conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.680

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207