MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095328311 · doi:10.1287/opre.2020.1990

The Discrete Moment Problem with Nonconvex Shape Constraints

2020· article· en· W3095328311 on OpenAlex
Xi Chen, Simai He, Bo Jiang, Christopher Ryan, Teng Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicRisk and Portfolio Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoment (physics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsPiecewiseNewsvendor modelSecond moment of areaDistribution (mathematics)ComputationApplied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discrete moment problem aims to find a worst-case discrete distribution that satisfies a given set of moments. This paper studies the discrete moment problems with additional shape constraints that guarantee the worst-case distribution is either log-concave (LC) or has an increasing failure rate (IFR) or increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR). These classes are useful in practice, with applications in revenue management, reliability, and inventory control. The authors characterize the structure of optimal extreme point distributions and show, for example, that an optimal extreme point solution to a moment problem with m moments and LC shape constraints is piecewise geometric with at most m pieces. Using this optimality structure, they design an exact algorithm for computing optimal solutions in a low-dimensional space of parameters. The authors leverage this structure to study a robust newsvendor problem with shape constraints and compute optimal solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.836
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it