Evaluating the Cytometric Detection and Enumeration of the Wine Bacterium, <i>Oenococcus oeni</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a high-throughput tool for determining microbial abundance in a range of medical, environmental, and food-related samples. For wine, determining the abundance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is well-defined and reliable. However, for the most common wine bacterium, Oenococcus oeni, using flow cytometry to determine cell concentration poses some challenges. O. oeni most often occurs in doublets or chains of varying lengths that can be greater than seven cells. This wine bacterium is also small, at 0.2-0.6 μm and may exhibit a range of morphologies including binary fission and aggregated complexes. This work demonstrates a straightforward approach to determining the suitability of flow cytometry for the chain-forming bacteria, O. oeni, and considerations when using flow cytometry for the enumeration of small microorganisms (<0.5 μm). © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it