MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095367260 · doi:10.1115/pvp2020-21575

Numerical Simulation of the Assembly Process of Bolted Flange Joints Used in Rotating Machinery

2020· article· en· W3095367260 on OpenAlexaff
Linbo Zhu, Abdel‐Hakim Bouzid, Jun Hong, Zhenming Shi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Structural Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBolted jointFlangeStructural engineeringFinite element methodVibrationEngineeringEccentricity (behavior)Joint (building)Gas compressorMechanical engineeringAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bolted joints are widely used to connect structural components in rotating machinery. However, the initial tightening of the bolts is a delicate operation because it is extremely difficult to achieve the target load and uniformity due to elastic interaction. The scatter in the bolt preload has a major impact on the concentricity and consequently the dynamic behavior of rotating machinery. The risk of failure due to vibration and fatigue under service loading becomes an issue. This paper treats the effect of elastic interaction on the eccentricity during the tightening of bolted joints of rotating machinery using finite element (FE) method. In this regard, a two-component bolted flange joint of a high pressure compressor (HPC) of an aero-engine is investigated. The component surface tolerances measured by Rotary Precision Instruments (RPI) are taken into account in the numerical simulation. A method is proposed to calculate the concentricity of components obtained from the radial runout data based on the Least Square method (LSM). The scatter in bolt preload under different interference fit, surfaces tolerance, initial preload, and tightening sequence are evaluated. Furthermore, the influence of these structures and tightening sequence parameters on the concentricity are investigated. The validity of the finite element analysis is supported by experimental tests conducted on scaled specimens of HPC. This study can provide guidance and enhance the dynamic performance of bolted joints for rotating machinery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Structural Analysis MethodsFrench-language works237,207