MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095408492 · doi:10.1080/19236026.2020.1734405

Modeling the influence of electric shovel operator performance on mine productivity

2020· article· en· W3095408492 on OpenAlex
Ali Yaghini, Robert A. Hall, Derek B. Apel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIM Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShovelHaulageOperator (biology)ProductivityTruckProduction (economics)QueueComputer scienceEngineeringMining engineeringAutomotive engineeringAlgorithmMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Truck-shovel systems are commonly used for material handling during surface mining. Not only does the overall outcome of a mine rely heavily on haulage system performance, but it constitutes a significant portion of mine operational costs. Using detailed data from a shovel monitoring system, this study statistically analyzes variations among key performance activities by shovel operators. Based on the results, a novel operator relative score system is introduced. To quantify the extent to which different aspects of a mining operation could be influenced by shovel operator practices, an operator discrete event simulation sub-module was developed and verified. Results showed that operators could affect mine production, number of trucks, and queue times by up to 20, 16, and 41%, respectively. This simulation model can be used by mining companies to assess their current shovel performance and improve production by modifying shovel operator practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it