MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095420528

Big, clean power : Genesee 3 sets new standards in power production

2005· article· en· W3095420528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCIM bulletin · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicRenewable energy and sustainable power systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoalJoint ventureEnvironmental sciencePower stationWaste managementNatural gasEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The construction of Alberta's $695 million, 500 MW Genesee 3 coal-fired power plant was discussed. The power plant offers notable improvements on environmental performance compared to its predecessors, Genesee 1 and Genesee 2. Efficiencies have been improved by 18 per cent over the average coal-fired facility in Alberta. The construction of Genesee 3 was a joint venture between Epcor and TransAlta. Mining is done by Luscar in a joint venture with Epcor. Planning for Genesee 3 began in 1998 at a time when innovation was needed to meet the increasing standards for environmental performance and to meet the objectives of the Kyoto Protocol. The solution was a super critical pulverized coal technology which uses higher steam temperatures and higher steam pressures to make more use of the energy available and lower the amount of coal required. As a result, Genesee 3 decreased the amount of nitrogen oxide emissions by about 50 per cent compared to its predecessors. Emissions of sulphur dioxide were lowered from 258 to 180 nanograms per joule. Genesee 3 also capture 99.9 per cent of particulate matter. The company also committed to offset the amount of carbon dioxide produced to the equivalent of natural gas combined cycle plants by buying emission credits. In order to meet energy demand, the mine was expanded from 3.5 to 5.2 million tonnes per year. Current reserves indicate a mine life of about 50 years. The mine uses conventional dragline mining, but the dragline sits on a bench and is used to mine the coal and pile it on the bench as well. Additional shovels and 240-tonne trucks will be purchased by 2010 to handle increased loads. Disturbed ground is fully reclaimed within 4 to 5 years of mining. The power plant includes a circuit with a super critical pulverized coal technology, low NOx burners, flue gas desulphurization units to lower sulphur dioxide, and a baghouse. In 2005, Epcor acquired 744 MW of power plants throughout North America, ranging from wind, natural gas, waste wood and hydro. Epcor also operates 1,300 MW of coal-fired capacity and is pursuing other environmentally-sound, coal-fired power plants. 2 figs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it