MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095500496 · doi:10.1090/proc/15505

A note on decreasing rearrangement and mean oscillation on measure spaces

2021· preprint· lv· W3095500496 on OpenAlexafffund
Almut Burchard, Galia Dafni, Ryan Gibara

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2021
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalConcordia UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMeasure (data warehouse)Oscillation (cell signaling)MathematicsSpace (punctuation)Metric (unit)Upper and lower boundsMetric spaceConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysisCombinatoricsComputer scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We derive bounds on the mean oscillation of the decreasing rearrangement f ∗ f^* on R + \mathbb {R}_+ in terms of the mean oscillation of f f on a suitable measure space X X . In the special case of a doubling metric measure space, the bound depends only on the doubling constant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.040
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.040
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.008
Open science0.0030.006
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis ResearchFrench-language works237,207