Multi-agent Modeling of the Collaborative Operation of the Producer Service Supply Chain under the Intelligent Manufacturing Clusters in the Yangtze River Delta
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the proliferation and aggregation of advanced production technology and information technology, several regional intelligent manufacturing clusters have taken shape in China. The development of intelligent manufacturing, which is highly technical, innovative, and informatized, needs the support of more professional producer services. Considering the broad scope of producer service supply-demand in regional intelligent manufacturing, this paper takes the intelligent manufacturing cluster in the Yangtze River Delta as the object, analyzes the limited access to producer services required for production operations, and proposes to integrate and supply the resources of multiple service agents in the region in a dynamic and collaborative manner. Then, the Multi-Agent model was constructed for the producer service supply chain, and the relevant factor libraries and decision libraries were designed. Finally, an empirical analysis was carried out to evaluate the stability of the collaborative operation of the producer service supply chain under the effect of some collaboration factors. The results show that the model has a certain theoretical reference value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it