MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3095630260 · doi:10.1201/b22619-54

Fluvial erosion of glacial tills and clay deposits: Sampling method

2020· book-chapter· en· W3095630260 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
L. Gonthier, D. Yeats, Susan Gaskin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil erosion and sediment transport
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluvialGlacial periodGeologyErosionGeochemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quaternary glacial deposits underlie Eastern Canada. Rivers incised in till and clay deposits can erode rapidly in high flows. Regions within the St-Lawrence Lowlands having land use change resulting in higher peak discharges can experience greater erosion rates, exacerbated by increased precipitation due to climate change. There is limited knowledge of the complex erosion processes of rivers in tills or of the range of critical shear stresses in either tills or clay deposits, particularly sensitive clays. Based on surficial geology maps and field surveys, representative minimally disturbed samples of clays and tills were collected from streambeds. The Sherbrooke sampler was used to collect clay samples for geotechnical testing and two methods were developed to collect samples for geotechnical and fluvial erosion testing for both clays and tills. The geotechnical properties will later be correlated with the critical shear stresses obtained from flume erosion tests of the samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.407
Threshold uncertainty score0.809

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil erosion and sediment transport→French-language works237,207→