A less invasive system for the direct measurement of ventilation in fish
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most previous systems for quantifying ventilatory flow in fish involve prior anesthesia and difficult surgery to sew or glue membranes to the animal, which are undoubtedly stressful. By modification of the original “van Dam box” design and incorporation of an electromagnetic blood flow probe, we have developed a less invasive system that avoids these problems and provides breath-to-breath measurements of ventilatory flow in real time. The fish can be quickly moved in and out of the apparatus, facilitating repeated measurements on the same animal after different treatments. We have used the system to document the hyperventilatory and hypoventilatory responses to environmental hypoxia and hyperoxia, respectively, in both ∼400-g trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and 10-g goldfish (Carassius auratus); the method is easily adaptable to fish of other sizes. Separate experiments on trout have demonstrated that responses to these treatments in buccal pressure amplitude, breathing frequency, and ventilation index are not altered by the attachments used in the apparatus. This less invasive methodology may prove more acceptable to animal ethics committees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".