MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095654893 · doi:10.14447/jnmes.v23i3.a09

Performance Evaluation of a Solar PV/T Water Heater Integrated with Inorganic Salt Based Energy Storage Medium

2020· article· en· W3095654893 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Prakash, B. Meenakshipriya, S. Vijayan, R. Kumaravelan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermal energy storageMaterials sciencePhase-change materialSolar energyEnergy storageThermalMass flow rateTube (container)Environmental scienceDifferential scanning calorimetrySalt waterComposite materialNuclear engineeringEnvironmental engineeringElectrical engineeringThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Thermal and Electrical performance of solar PV/T hybrid water heating system using salt mixture phase change materials in storage tank is analyzed in this study. Compare to all conventional type heaters, the solar PV/T hybrid module collector has ability to produces both electrical energy from PV module and utilizes incident solar energy to heat the water. The sheet and tube type absorber is used to heat up the tube which is attached at the back side of PV module and transfer the heat to flowing water and the electrical energy is tested by connecting the DC load on the PV terminals under glazed and unglazed modes respectively. To enhance the thermal performance, energy storage medium is used as phase change materials at good proportion in the tank. The thermo physical properties of PCM are analyzed by Differential Scanning Calorimetry. This experimental testing is conducted from 8.00 to 17.00 IST in various sunny days and results are compared for glazed and unglazed conditions. The results shows that the average water temperature easily reaches 38-45°C and the final temperature of water never dropped below 34°, the temperature of PCM is 45.6oC, which is 5oC higher than outlet. The amount of heat stored using PCM in tank is 16.86% greater than no-PCM in the tank for constant 0.01 kg/s mass flow rate. The daily average electrical efficiency is 6.4% under glazed mode and 8.8% under unglazed conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of New Materials for Electrochemical SystemsSame topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207