An efficient computational approach for local fractional Poisson equation in fractal media
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this article, we analyze local fractional Poisson equation (LFPE) by employing q ‐homotopy analysis transform method ( q ‐HATM). The PE describes the potential field due to a given charge with the potential field known, one can then calculate gravitational or electrostatic field in fractal domain. It is an elliptic partial differential equations (PDE) that regularly appear in the modeling of the electromagnetic mechanism. In this work, PE is studied in the local fractional operator sense. To handle the LFPE some illustrative example is discussed. The required results are presented to demonstrate the simple and well‐organized nature of q‐ HATM to handle PDE having fractional derivative in local fractional operator sense. The results derived by the discussed technique reveal that the suggested scheme is easy to employ and computationally very accurate. The graphical representation of solution of LFPE yields interesting and better physical consequences of Poisson equation with local fractional derivative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it