Truth and Reconciliation in Eighteenth-Century Literature: The Case of the “Monster Brandt”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thomas Campbell’s “Gertrude of Wyoming” (1809) plays an important and overlooked role in diplomacy between Indigenous peoples and Britain. The poem fictionalizes the Battle of Wyoming, a historical event in the American War of Independence, but includes a depiction of Joseph Brant, a real Mohawk leader. This depiction was contested by Brant’s son John when he travelled to England in 1821–22, but scholarship on this event has not located John Brant’s engagement with Campbell’s poem within the wider diplomatic mission he was undertaking. This article argues that the poem should be read within the context of Campbell’s understanding of Indigenous diplomacy, John Brant’s role as a diplomat for Six Nations of the Grand River, and modern processes of Truth and Reconciliation in Canada. It concludes that Campbell’s response to John Brant, which included a public letter of apology, connects with contemporary settler evasiveness about Indigenous sovereignty.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.061 | 0.127 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".