MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095716823 · doi:10.7202/1072312ar

Contingences migratoires et inversion de rôles entre mari et femme en milieu franco-canadien

2020· article· fr· W3095716823 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Boniface Bahi

Bibliographic record

VenueMinorités linguistiques et société · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesFrenchPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pour le nouvel arrivant, la dynamique sociale d’une communauté d’accueil francophone en milieu minoritaire fait montre d’une conjonction d’identités qui sont liées à son quotidien. Cette conjonction laisse entrevoir un attachement culturel relativement fort du nouvel arrivant. Cet attachement est mis à l’épreuve des exigences adaptatives du milieu migratoire. Les interactions sociales aux niveaux intra-culturel et interculturel tendent à ouvrir sur des processus de détribalisation en général et, plus particulièrement, sur une inversion des rôles traditionnels entre le mari et la femme. Par conséquent, une éventuelle intervention de spécialiste en travail social dans le cadre familial du nouvel arrivant s’impose, non sans difficulté. En s’appuyant sur les données de notre étude Inclusion de nouveaux arrivants en milieu scolaire franco-manitobain, cette analyse s’attache à mettre en relief des contours de nouveaux défis familiaux en contexte francophone minoritaire au Canada. Principalement à travers des entrevues semi-dirigées, nous avons constaté une mutation des rôles entre mari et femme, qui nécessite de nouvelles pratiques en intervention sociale auprès de la famille en contexte immigrant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.006
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMinorités linguistiques et sociétéSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207