MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095800282 · doi:10.18280/ts.370412

A Miniaturized CPW-Fed Reconfigurable Antenna with a Single-Dual Band and an Asymmetric Ground Plane for Switchable Band Wireless Applications

2020· article· en· W3095800282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdessalam El Yassini, Mohammed Ali Jallal, Saïda Ibnyaich, Abdelouhab Zeroual, Samira Chabaa

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReconfigurable antennaGround planeAntenna (radio)Multi-band devicePIN diodeOptoelectronicsWiMAXWirelessElectrical engineeringOmnidirectional antennaPhysicsTelecommunicationsAntenna efficiencyComputer scienceDiodeEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A miniaturized reconfigurable antenna with a hexagonal slot is presented. The motivation of this study is to overcome the problem of switching band antenna with minimum electronic components while designing a miniaturized antenna. The reconfigurable band property has been obtained using only two PIN diodes. The suggested structure has successfully permitted the reconfigurable ability up to three bands of 2.36-2.81 GHz, 3.20-4.23 GHz, and 3.13-5.92 GHz, which well suitable for the standard of the WLAN and WiMAX bands of 5.8/2.4/5.2 GHz and 5.5/2.5/3.5 GHz respectively. The peck gain and efficiency of the reconfigurable antenna at resonant frequencies 2.58, 3.56, 3.58, and 5.63 GHz are 1.48, 1.69, 1.89, 3.44 dBi and 89.60, 87.14, 90.48, 81.57%. The suggested antenna has a compact dimension of 31 × 14.5 mm2. This antenna has a better performance which makes it a good candidate to use in a variety of multimode wireless devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.934
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207