MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095812284 · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n8p105

The Concept of Continuing Education in the Context of Its Modernisation and Reform in Oil Training

2020· article· en· W3095812284 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Olga Panchenko, В. Т. Волов, Yevgeny Arkadyevich Volokhin, Mirsaid Pulat ugli Mirasrarov, Diana Rinatovna Khisamutdinova

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Higher Education · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKazan Federal University
KeywordsModernization theoryVocational educationContext (archaeology)Relevance (law)Continuing educationThe RepublicPolitical scienceTraining (meteorology)Petroleum industryQuality (philosophy)Economic growthMedical educationEngineeringMedicineEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article presents the concept of development and modernisation of the model of multi-level continuing vocational education for the oil and gas industry of the Udmurt Republic under the conditions of its reform. The relevance of continuing education research in the context of its modernisation and reform stems from the need for highly qualified staff and the need to modernise the vocational education system. The article highlights the positive effects of the network forms of educational programs using individual learning paths implemented following the Concept for the Modernisation and Development of a Multi-Level Continuing Vocational Education Model The oil and gas industry of the Udmurt Republic (Russian Federation) is undergoing educational reform. The results of the monitoring of the effectiveness of the implementation of the model of continuous vocational training for the oil and gas sector show a high level of demand, employment and the quality of education received by graduates of educational institutions of the Resource Centre for Training of Personnel for the Oil and Gas Industry of Udmurtia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.015
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Higher EducationSame topicEngineering and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207