MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095827975 · doi:10.11159/cdsr20.155

Roundabout Situational Awareness for Automated Vehicles with HybridMachine Learning Approach

2020· article· en· W3095827975 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the International Conference of Control, Dynamic systems, and Robotics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRoundaboutComputer scienceSituation awarenessArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interactionSituation analysisSituational ethicsTransport engineeringEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a hybrid approach for situational awareness in roundabouts is presented that can produce traffic participants' behaviour for arbitrary horizons. This real-time implementable strategy consists of dynamic Bayesian network and a continuous variable prediction module (CVPM) as its subparts, making it a data-driven approach while providing the facility to incorporate experts' knowledge into the predictions. Being a data-driven approach, the data is obtained using SUMO as a simulation platform, and three different CVPMs are experimented with, namely recurrent neural network (RNN), gated recurrent unit (GRU), and long short-term memory networks (LSTM). The chosen RNN yields a correlation higher than 0.895 and RMSE less than 0.036 for 10 seconds predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it