MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095845350 · doi:10.1002/9781119547143.ch62

Self‐efficacy Theory

2020· other· en· W3095845350 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas I. Vaughan‐Johnston, Jill A. Jacobson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · 2020
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelf-efficacyOutcome (game theory)PsychologySocial learning theoryPsychological interventionSocial psychologySocial cognitive theoryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-efficacy refers to the belief that one is capable of performing the necessary actions to achieve a desired outcome. Albert Bandura's (1977, 1982) self-efficacy theory was intended to unify successful coping and goal achievement and focused on outcome and efficacy expectations as the key ingredients. He also proposed four antecedents to self-efficacy including vicarious learning or modeling. Self-efficacy theory has been influential in social, developmental, and clinical psychology spawning many experiments, measures, interventions, and even components of other theories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual DifferencesSame topicYouth Development and Social SupportFrench-language works237,207