MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095932100 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.562418

More Caution Needed for Patients Recovered From COVID-19

2020· article· en· W3095932100 on OpenAlexaff
Junxian Zhang, Hongying Qu, Cheng Li, Ziyi Li, Guanming Li, Junzhang Tian, Guowei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)MedicineViral shedding2019-20 coronavirus outbreakCoronavirusConvalescent plasmaVirologyIntensive care medicineDiseaseBetacoronavirusVirusImmunologyInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since Disease Control and Prevention, 2020) These findings from recovered patients with re-detectable SARS-CoV-again. To explore this public health concern, we systematically searched PubMed (up to May 14, 2020) to summarize the available evidence from studies that documented the recovered patients with re-detectable SARS-CoV-2, using the search terms ("novel coronavirus" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "COVID-19") AND ("recovered" OR "discharged") AND ("positive" OR "re-detectable") with no language or time restrictions.Currently nucleic acid detection represents the most widely used test to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection.Following had longer duration of viral shedding and even could be detected until death. (Lan et al., 2020;Zhou et al., 2020) For instance, given that the use of corticosteroids could delay the clearance of viral nucleic acids, it remains largely unknown about whether patients with severe COVID-19 and receiving corticosteroid treatment would produce transmissible SARS-CoV-2 after hospital discharge. (Ling et al., 2020)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Public HealthSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207