MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095951841 · doi:10.4324/9781003097068-2

Movement initiation

2020· book-chapter· en· W3095951841 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeff Kaplan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMovement (music)ArtAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 1, “Movement initiation—Dance and refugee performance,” begins with beginnings. It introduces the idea of “movement initiation,” which within dance practice specifies a point in the body where a movement (“kinetic chain”) originates. The chapter examines the forces that set refugees in motion, as well as the effects that movement initiations have on individual experience. It then makes a close reading of Canadian choreographer Crystal Pite’s work Flight Pattern (2017), for the Royal Ballet in London. Pite speaks with eloquence about the impulse that led her to make a work about refugees, and movement initiations on a body level stand out as a defining feature of her choreography. The chapter concludes with New York City-based Battery Dance, an organization that has taken its “Dancing to Connect” program to over sixty countries. A five-year multi-agency grant is allowing the company to send Dancing to Connect facilitators to seventeen cities across Germany to engage in refugee integration workshops. Battery’s organizational movement initiation results in kinetic chains of dance activity among refugee communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0950.035

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207