MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3095973959 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggaa518

Focusing joint inversion of gravity and magnetic data using a clustering stabilizer in a space of weighted parameters

2020· article· en· W3095973959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhengwei Xu, Guangui Zou, Qianqian Wei, Junqi Tian, Hemin Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina University of Mining and TechnologyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaKøbenhavns UniversitetUniversity of Houston
KeywordsInversion (geology)GeodesyCluster analysisGeologyGeophysicsInverse theoryJoint (building)Space (punctuation)SeismologyMathematicsComputer scienceStatisticsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY This paper develops a minimum-support focusing stabilizer to perform a joint inversion of the vertical components of gravity and magnetic data using fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM) with the regularized Newton method in a space of weighted parameters. Not only does this joint inversion technology arrive at the conditionally well-posed traditional potential field inversion, but it also increases the structural correlation between multiple inverted models. The FCM and the focusing stabilizer make it possible to balance the convergence of the data space (D) and the model space (M), guiding multimodal geophysical parameters toward assigned petrophysical values, which makes the results more stable and realistic. Two model studies are presented to illustrate the method, a simple synthetic model with two rectangular bodies in a homogenous background and a realistic model of the Volcanogenic Massive Sulfide (VMS) deposits in northeastern New Brunswick, Canada. These models demonstrate that the new focusing joint inversion algorithm produces better images than traditional methods because the FCM function uses the structural correlation of density contrast and magnetic susceptibility as constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207