Des documents de référence pour l’enseignement et l’évaluation d’objets de l’oral au primaire québécois
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La question de l’évaluation de la compétence à communiquer oralement est peu abordée dans les travaux en didactique de l’oral au Québec et dans l’ensemble de la francophonie. Dans le cadre d’une recherche collaborative menée en milieu plurilingue et pluriethnique au Québec auprès de huit enseignantes du primaire, il a été possible d’explorer cette question. Chercheurs et enseignantes ont coconstruit des outils pour faciliter l’enseignement et l’évaluation de cette compétence, soit des documents de référence d’objets de l’oral, et ce, à partir des compétences réelles des élèves selon les trois cycles de l’école primaire québécoise (élèves 6 à 12 ans).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it